Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:34 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2015 1:01 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:26 pm
Posts: 214
Hi
Should the bridge plate float free of the x braces or butt up to them?
Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2015 1:12 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 13526
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
I butt mine right up to the X-brace legs but never, never, never tuck it or inlet it under the X legs as some plans show.... Reason being that bridge plates may need to be serviced (or moved it you put it in the wrong place for the scale length). Not a problem before the top is installed and WAY harder to do but not at all impossible after the box is closed.

I beveled all bridge plate edges as well.



These users thanked the author Hesh for the post: Cablepuller (Sun May 10, 2015 1:15 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2015 1:17 pm 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 13526
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
I'll add since most here only deal with newly built instruments: A very common thing that can happen to bridge plates is they start to wear where the string balls bear on the pin hole edges. This is much more likely because of the advent and proliferation of cheap, plastic, molded pins. The cheap or plastic part is not the issue, the slots are which can encourage the string ball to migrate up the pin holes.

As the bridge plate wears in the area of the pin holes material loses it's integrity and as such the plate can start to crease using the worn pin holes as a guide. This makes the bridge patch no longer level and encourages the bridge to lift too. The bridge is actually one of the most important braces on a guitar so when it lifts the top loses a lot of it's strength.

Anyway when all of this happens, and it does.... it's time to remove and replace the bridge plate. Inlet or tuck your bridge plate and the job is harder and you will be called lots of very colorful names more than likely by whom ever has to do it. That's what I do anyway.... :)



These users thanked the author Hesh for the post: Cablepuller (Sun May 10, 2015 1:27 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2015 5:37 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I butt mine up to the X for increased stiffness. And only bevel the edges that don't meet.

_________________
Pat



These users thanked the author Pmaj7 for the post: Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:36 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2015 7:26 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:36 am
Posts: 7433
Location: Southeast US
City: Lenoir City
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37772
Country: US
Focus: Repair
pat macaluso wrote:
I butt mine up to the X for increased stiffness. And only bevel the edges that don't meet.


That's what I do too.

_________________
Steve Smith
"Music is what feelings sound like"



These users thanked the author SteveSmith for the post: Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:36 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:13 am
Posts: 1167
Location: United States
State: Texas
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
I do not recall an in-depth discussion of the bridge plate on the OLF, could this be it?

I am beginning to believe the bridge plate should be, at most, a place for the string balls to sit, and nothing more.

_________________
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008907949110



These users thanked the author David Newton for the post (total 3): Hesh (Mon May 11, 2015 5:07 am) • Pmaj7 (Mon May 11, 2015 2:12 am) • Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:36 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 12:33 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 2:25 pm
Posts: 1957
First name: George
City: Seattle
State: WA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I do mine in the same manner as Pat and Steve.

_________________
George :-)



These users thanked the author George L for the post: Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:37 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 2:12 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2260
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
David Newton wrote:
I do not recall an in-depth discussion of the bridge plate on the OLF, could this be it?

I am beginning to believe the bridge plate should be, at most, a place for the string balls to sit, and nothing more.

Lol

_________________
Pat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 6:28 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5542
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
David Newton wrote:
I do not recall an in-depth discussion of the bridge plate on the OLF, could this be it?
I am beginning to believe the bridge plate should be, at most, a place for the string balls to sit, and nothing more.


I do believe I recall at least one thread, mainly about the types of wood used, use of laminations, size, grain orientation

I'm not so sure about the
Quote:
nothing more
.
Otherwise a 1/2" or so strip of hardwood for the bridge pin holes would suffice. (I believe this has been done, perhaps with a spruce bridge plate)

The bridge plate (normally) extends front and back of the bridge footprint so can/does resist bridge rotation, also reducing reducing the stress risers front and back of the bridge.
It adds to lateral stiffness of the top.
I have also seen discussions here of different bridge plate woods contributing to the character of the tone/sound of a guitar.

David, I do agree that perhaps this particular topic could be worth a "current opinion" poll, but think perhaps it warrants a thread of its own, rather than hijacking a tread with a simple query like
Quote:
Should the bridge plate float free of the x braces or butt up to them? What do you think?


P.S. for the bridge plate, I do the same as Hesh, untucked, beveled all sides.
I orient the grain lines so they do not run along the same axis as the bridge pin holes. (same with the bridge itself) Feel that is quite important.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Last edited by Colin North on Mon May 11, 2015 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.


These users thanked the author Colin North for the post: Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:27 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 6:44 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:03 am
Posts: 1737
Location: Litchfield MI
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I subscribe to Don Teeter's advice (same as Hesh) which points to the fact that a tucked/trapped BP can result in a long term maintenance problem. I believe the bridge plate and bridge combine to make the most massive brace on the sound board. I doubt there are any sonic or structural pluses or minuses keeping the ends clear of the X legs or butting.

_________________
Ken Cierp

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/



These users thanked the author kencierp for the post: Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:28 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 8:48 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:31 am
Posts: 936
Location: Ottawa, Canada
I actually try to position the bridge plate about 1/32" - 1/16" away from the X brace. My rational is to allow a little bit of room for the plate to swell or move without it pressing sideways on the braces. I really don't know if this is necessary or not.
Pat

_________________
There are three kinds of people:

Those that make things happen,
those that watch things happen,
and those that wondered what happened.



These users thanked the author Pat Hawley for the post: Cablepuller (Mon May 11, 2015 12:28 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 9:06 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:03 am
Posts: 1737
Location: Litchfield MI
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
It would seem that the sound board would be expanding and contracting in a proportional manner?

_________________
Ken Cierp

http://www.kennethmichaelguitars.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 9:16 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
kencierp wrote:
I believe the bridge plate and bridge combine to make the most massive brace on the sound board. I doubt there are any sonic or structural pluses or minuses keeping the ends clear of the X legs or butting.

I concure but I butt the plate against the X because it looks neater ( not that too many folks will be looking) and helps to provide spot on location as per my lay out lines. Again another one of those things that may or may not float your boat.

T o m
h l a
e d m

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 2:14 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 3605
First name: Dennis
Last Name: Kincheloe
City: Kansas City
State: MO
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Tom West wrote:
T o m
h l a
e d m

I think you've got a typo in there, old mam ;)

I do a lot of different styles with braces running over the bridge plate, tucking everywhere, and so on. I'll write more about it in the other thread. But for traditional X bracing, bevel all around and butt to the X.



These users thanked the author DennisK for the post: Cablepuller (Thu May 14, 2015 12:39 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 4:14 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:04 pm
Posts: 295
First name: Mike
Last Name: Vallandigham
City: Martinez
State: CA
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I tuck it. Guess I'm weird. :)



These users thanked the author MikeyV for the post: Cablepuller (Thu May 14, 2015 12:39 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: doncaparker and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com